spot_img

Nigeria to open two...

Nigeria is set to launch two significant lithium processing facilities this year, signaling...

Hexagon Electrical plays an...

Hexagon Electrical has expanded its manufacturing and service capabilities to meet growing demand...

TOMRA Mining LASER technology...

Vertex Minerals (ASX: VTX) is revolutionizing gold processing at its Hill End project...

Africa is early adopter...

An African mine will be among the first adopters of the innovative Rail-Running...
Home Blog Page 11

Bridge Construction Methods Transformed by Crane Alternatives

0

On many bridge construction projects, cranes are sometimes the best and only option for moving heavy items around a site. But there are many situations when alternative equipment is needed.

The limitations of cranes for bridge construction include:

Poor Accessibility: A generous amount of space is needed to position and operate a crane, which can be difficult in areas with limited access or tight spaces.
Height restrictions: Cranes lift the load from above, so the height of cranes limits their usefulness on projects involving overhead obstacles, such as cables or underneath a roof structure.
Weight restrictions: Cranes have capacity restrictions that can limit their ability to lift very heavy bridge components.
Weather conditions: Strong winds, heavy rain, or extreme temperatures affect the stability and safety of crane operations, making it difficult to work in certain conditions.
Cost: Cranes can be expensive to rent or purchase, and their high operating costs can add up quickly.
What are the alternatives to cranes?
Precise lifting and positioning are crucial during bridge and highway construction. While cranes are the mainstay of many projects, in some cases the use of a crane is impractical or simply too expensive, especially due to the extensive transportation logistics required to get all crane parts to the construction site.

Various alternative lifting systems exist and are proving increasingly efficient, these include:

Hydraulic Strand Jacks: Compact, easy to transport, and powerful enough to lift loads of over 3,000 tonnes without difficulty.

Hydraulic Gantries: Using four or more telescopic legs and beams that allow heavy loads to be lifted vertically, and along a track when required.

Jack-Up Systems: Lifting loads in successive stages using spacers, called “barrels”, stacked together to form lifting towers t0 mechanically support the load.

The Importance of the Center of Gravity of a Load When Using a Gantry

0

If you intend to use a hydraulic gantry to lift a heavy load, the most obvious thing to note is the weight of the load. You will then be able to determine if your gantry has the capacity to get the job done.

Seems easy enough? Well, there’s more to it than you might think.

If your gantry has the right capacity and can be configured to accommodate the length and breadth of the load, you’re on the right track – but there’s still another important factor to consider: the center of gravity of the load (CoG).

If the CoG is not central to the load, and if the load is close to the gantry’s capacity limit this becomes increasingly more important. It can be the difference between success and failure.

Gantry Capacities Explained
When we look at the SL400 Hydraulic Gantry, this has a maximum total capacity of 400 tons, which is shared across the 4 units. Therefore, we know that each individual unit has a maximum capacity of 100 tons. Note that with a telescopic gantry, this is the capacity at the first (lowest) stage, it will be much less at the fully extended third stage.

The maximum capacity figure applies when the CoG of the load stays central to the footprint of the gantry. The images below illustrate the point. In Fig 4 a single leg is bearing most of the load which will cause overload.

Center of Gravity of a Load: Hydraulic Gantry Examples
load with even center of gravity with gantry
Fig 1: The load suspended by a gantry with the load spread evenly across the four leg units.
offset center of gravity load with gantry
Fig 2: Here we see a load positioned centrally within the gantry’s footprint, but when the center of gravity of a load is offset this means two of the legs are bearing extra load.
side shift gantry center of gravity
Fig 3: This shows a load with a centralized CoG. Caution is needed because side shift units are being used and the result is that two legs are to bearing extra load
gantry overload center of gravity
Fig 4: OVERLOAD! One leg is bearing most of the load

The Enerpac Virtual Heavy Lifting Experience
Take a virtual tour of our stand to see the latest Enerpac Heavy Lifting Technologies

Get Access
Using Side Shift Units with a Hydraulic Gantry
As we can see above, side-shifting has the potential to overload a gantry leg, even if the total load is within the gantry’s capacity. This is especially true as the length of the beams increase – the longer the beams or length of the object, the larger this unwanted effect is.

Center of Gravity of a Load: Key Takeaways

• Always make sure you know all details of the load, instead of just the total weight.
• When the load is offset, and/or you are using side shift units, a larger capacity gantry may be needed.
• Be aware that an off-center CoG and/or side-shifting can result in overload.
• Remember to take the weight of the header beams and rigging into account in your calculations.
• If in doubt about the application, or the correct gantry size, please contact your Enerpac Heavy Lifting Technology Specialist.

Accelerated Bridge Construction: Definition and Benefits

0

What Is Accelerated Bridge Construction?
Accelerated bridge construction (ABC), is a quicker and smarter way to build and install bridges by minimizing the disruption caused by road and waterway closures.

With an estimated quarter of the bridges in the United States in need of repair or replacement, it’s no surprise the ABC approach to bridge construction is becoming more widely adopted.

In addition to time-saving, accelerated bridge construction provides other benefits too. Compared to traditional methods, ABC uses more effective planning, design, and procurement methods. The result of this is improved public and worker safety, and bridges that last for longer without the need for maintenance.

The Main Aspects of Accelerated Bridge Construction

Source: Accelerated Bridge Construction Technologies: FHAW Every day Counts Initiative
A simple way to understand ABC is to split the activities into the five main aspects as shown in the United States FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) Every Day Counts Initiative:

Foundation and Wall Elements – Simplified continuous process piles cast-In-place (ACIP) piles, Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Integrated Bridge System, Prefabricated Pier Cofferdams, Rapid Embankment Construction.
Fast Track Contracting – Different models of contracting that combine the parties involved. For example, Design and Build – with early contractor input into design decisions.
PBES (Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems) – Fabricating elements in a controlled environment off site for assembly at the bridge location. Described in more detail later in this article.
Structure Placement Methods – Transporting and moving the elements into position.
Why Accelerated Bridge Construction is Faster
ABC involves manufacturing large components and modules offsite and transporting them to the bridge location for quick installation. Depending upon the project and type of bridge, the installation can typically last just a few hours or 2 to 3 days.

By comparison, conventional bridge construction methods do not center around the objective of reducing construction time. Instead, they rely on sequential time-consuming stages, such as casting concrete in place, and adding reinforcing steel – often held up by weather conditions.

Measuring the Effectiveness of Accelerated Bridge Construction
There are two main metrics used to measure time in accelerated bridge construction projects:

Onsite Construction Time. From when the first contractor makes alterations to the job site until all the construction-related equipment is removed. Includes materials, equipment, personnel, and traffic control.

Mobility Impact Time. The period of time when traffic flow is impacted because of the project. This is categorized using 6 tiers.

Tier 1: Traffic impacts within 1 day
Tier 2: Traffic impacts within 3 days
Tier 3: Traffic impacts within 2 weeks
Tier 4: Traffic impacts within 1 month
Tier 5: Traffic impacts within 3 months
Tier 6: Overall project schedule is significantly reduced by months to years

traffic jam bridge construction
Total project time is a metric that gets less attention than the other two. This is because all bridge projects need planning – regardless of the construction methods used. The total project time is calculated from when project planning begins until all construction work is completed.

Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems (PBES)
Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems (PBES) are the components of a bridge made either off-site or nearby. From a project management perspective, these items are not on the critical path so do not affect the construction time. Advanced design and high-performance materials used under controlled environmental conditions ensure long-term durability, high quality, and safety.

Example Prefabricated Elements Used in ABC
Deck Elements
Beam Elements
Pier Elements
Abutment and Wall Elements
Superstructure Systems – Deck and primary supporting members.
Total Bridge Systems: The entire superstructure and substructures. (Rolled/launched/slid/lifted into place).
Structure Placement Methods and Equipment
The size and weight of the elements in accelerated construction projects can be considerable. Cranes are still used for bridge construction, but there are many other types of heavy lifting technologies used – each with its own merits.

Equipment Type by Application
Strand Jacks

A strand jack has a much smaller footprint than a crane and provides greater precision. Also, a single operator can control several strand jacks synchronously via computerized control from a central location.

Strand Jacks work by lifting the load from above, which makes them especially useful when constructing a bridge over a waterway. The case study below describes how strand Jacks were used to lift 11 deck sections during the construction of the Golden Horn Metro Bridge in Istanbul.

Strand Jacks Bridge Case Study
Strand Jack Product Specs
Jack Up Systems
A Jack Up System uses hydraulics to lift incrementally from below the load. A typical setup includes four or more jack-up units, one positioned at each corner the load. Enerpac Jack-Up units contain four hydraulic cylinders in each unit to lift and stack strong steel boxes. These automatically slide into position to support the load and form lifting towers. Lifting speed depends upon the model chosen, but this is generally between 5 and 20 feet per hour. A Jack Up System is ideal in situations where overhead cables prevent lifting from above.

The following case study describes how a Jack Up System played a key part during the construction of helped the Fore River Bridge in Massachusetts, US. Using an Enerpac Jack Up System helped to ensure minimal disruption to vehicle and boat traffic.

Jack Up System Case Study
Jack Up Systems Specs
Self-Propelled Modular Transporters (SPMTs)
These are high-capacity and highly maneuverable transport trailers. Unlike trucks, SPMTs are self-propelled from the onboard hydraulic power pack. They are ‘modular’ because two more can be connected to transport longer loads.

The example below shows a bridge deck being moved into position using Enerpac Cube Jacks mounted onto an SPMT.

SPMT (Self Propelled Modular Transporter) with Enerpac SCJ100 Cube Jacks for positioning a bridge deck.
Horizontal Skidding Systems
Skidding Systems provide the ability to slide large segments by minimizing the force needed to push bridge segments into place. They work using push-pull hydraulic cylinders and pre-constructed tracks covered with low friction PTFE-coated pads.

A good example showing a skidding system used for Accelerated Bridge Construction is when a new bridge structure over the Holbrook Canal was built adjacent to the original bridge. It was temporarily used as a detour while the deficient bridge was demolished and later slid into the position using a skidding system.

Transnet assigned to the Department of Transport

Transnet has been assigned to the Department of Transport, following the removal of the Department of Public Enterprises from government structures in the new administration.

President Cyril Ramaphosa has assigned shareholder responsibility for each of the state-owned enterprises that previously fell under the Department of Public Enterprises to the respective line-function Ministries.

The President has signed a proclamation appointing the Minister in the Presidency responsible for Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation as the executive authority of the Department of Public Enterprises (DPE), which will continue to exist and operate until the human and financial resources are transferred appropriately.

The Minister in the Presidency responsible for Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation has also been assigned the responsibility to finalise the National State Enterprise Bill, which will set out the exercise of shareholder responsibility for respective SOEs which will be transferred in a phased manner into the envisaged national enterprise holding company.

Other maritime-related entities which have been impacted by the closing of the Department of Public Enterprises include:

Alexkor – will be transferred to the Minister of Mineral and Petroleum Resources
Denel will be transferred to the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans

Strong demand for wild caught fish buoys performance

Benefiting from improved pricing and strong demand in wild-caught fish, the Sea Harvest Group has recorded a three percent revenue increase to R3.3 billion over the last six months.

Acknowledging the tragic incident that saw the loss of 11 crewmen during the same period, CEO Felix Ratheb described the first six months of the year as the “toughest months in the history of the Group”.

“The Board, management and staff extend our deepest condolences to the families and loved ones to the 11 crewmen lost at sea. As, a Group, we continue providing support to the affected families, whilst continuing to cooperate with the investigation into the incident by the South African Maritime Safety Authority (SAMSA),” he said.

The Group has completed the strategic acquisition of Aqunion and Saldanha/Westpoint Fishing which sees the company diversifying their exposure to include pelagic fishing. It has also effectively doubled their abalone business.

Commenting on the acquisition, Sea Harvest Group Chairman, Fred Robertson, noted that the transaction served to increase earnings and create a stronger business. “This transaction has increased black ownership in the fishing and abalone industries and broadened Sea Harvest’s shareholder base,” he added.

Lower catch volumes in the hake fishery were offset by significantly higher prices. “As we continue into the second half of 2024, we look forward to the fish volumes still available to be caught by the Group,” says Felix.

“With the addition of Sea Harvest Pelagics and Aqunion and the potential decrease in of interest rates, the Group looks forward to an ease in operating conditions for the rest of the year,” concluded Felix.

Five new tugboats were integrated into commercial shipping operations this week at the Port of Durban as Transnet National Ports Authority (TNPA) officially launched and christened the new acquisitions

The launch of the vessels comes shortly after the christening of a further two workboats for the Port of Cape Town last week. In addition, a further two tugs will be unveiled next month at a launch ceremony scheduled to be held in East London where they will take up service.

This brings TNPA’s tugboat complement to a total of 38 across its eight commercial seaports, with the Port of Durban boasting the highest number of 14 tugs.

Delivering the keynote address at the christening ceremony at the Port of Durban, Transnet Board Chairperson, Andile Sangqu highlighted the significance of investing in marine assets: “The procurement of this fleet demonstrates Transnet’s commitment to fully realising the Recovery Plan. We are now approaching 12 months of the 18-month cycle and can see improvement in the agility of executing strategic projects, which will enhance the organisation’s competitiveness. Meeting the objectives of the Marine Fleet Renewal Programme coupled with a skilled workforce will catapult our responsiveness to meeting global shipping demands.”

As the busiest port in sub-Saharan Africa, the additional fleet will enable the Port of Durban’s readiness to respond with on-demand craft in the safe navigation of vessels within the port.

With a bollard-pull of 60 tonnes, the tugs delivered by Damen Shipyards Cape Town feature the latest hull design and propulsion system consisting of diesel engines fitted with Azimuth Stern

Drive. These comply with the International Maritime Organisation’s Tier III environmental standards. This makes the tugs fully capable of handling larger vessels that call at South Africa’s premier container port.

Port users and stakeholder have been advised to submit written comments on the latest Tariff Application submitted by Transnet National Ports Authority (TNPA).

0

The Ports Regulator of South Africa issued an invitation yesterday for submissions ahead of a series of public consultation roadshow which will be held from 6 to 13 September.

Stakeholders will be able to submit comments up until 30 September on the tariff structure as well as the figures of volumes of cargoes contained in the application submitted by TNPA to the regulator at the beginning of this month.

More information relating to the public workshops will be released shortly.

African Energy Chamber accuses banks of financial apartheid

It is shocking that financial institutions that do business in Africa continue to practice financial apartheid by cutting off capital and financing to oil and gas companies operating in Africa because of climate concerns. These same institutions fund gas development in Europe, where natural gas is deemed green and a fossil fuel for Africans,” says NJ Ayuk, Executive Chairman of the African Energy Chamber (AEC).

The AEC is urging banks to reevaluate their approach and is calling on global financiers to support Africa’s energy projects.

As financial institutions continue to implement policies aimed at reducing support for fossil fuel projects, Africa has seen a sharp decline in investment in the continent’s oil and gas industry. The African Energy Chamber argues that these institutions are practicing “financial apartheid,” arguing that while similar projects receive support in Europe, Africa’s high-cost energy projects are being neglected.

Major international oil companies are reducing their presence in Africa. For instance, Equinor has withdrawn from offshore exploration in South Africa and ExxonMobil has exited a deep-water oil prospect in Ghana. This decline is contributing to a bleak outlook for Africa’s energy sector.

“As the international community moves to boycott investments in the African energy sector, African people and African development stand to suffer,” says Ayuk.

“The role of oil in Africa’s energy and economic future is apparent, and consequently, should be defended as Western elites move to disrupt African progress.”

Ayuk believes that the broader implications of financial divestment are profound. Many African governments rely on fossil fuels as a cost-effective means to alleviate energy poverty and boost state revenues.

He says that the International Energy Agency (IEA) has “lost its relevance and its authority” with its calls to cease funding for oil and gas projects. “Originally focused on managing oil supply disruptions, the IEA now prioritiaes policies aimed at achieving net-zero emissions by 2050. Its 2019 projection that no new investments in oil, gas, or coal are needed if the world continues on this path has been particularly controversial,” he says.

The AEC suggests that several key African projects are at risk due to the withdrawal of financial support. Significant initiatives like TotalEnergies’ Mozambique LNG project, ExxonMobil’s Rovuma LNG project, Nigeria’s Train 7 LNG expansion, Senegal’s Sangomar oil field, Uganda’s Tilenga project and the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) require substantial financing to advance.

The Tanzania LNG project, involving Equinor and Shell, is stalled due to proposed government changes. UTM Offshore’s FLNG project in Nigeria, initially planned for 2023, has been postponed. Additionally, the EACOP faces significant criticism from financiers and environmental groups, complicating its development and financing.

Namibia, experiencing heightened interest from recent oil discoveries, is facing delays with the Kudu Conventional Gas Development. The Kudu Gas Project, an offshore initiative, has faced setbacks related to financing and project development challenges. As a result, the project is still pending FID and anticipated to commence production by 2026.

Despite these setbacks, however, some projects are progressing. TotalEnergies is advancing its $20 billion Mozambique LNG project, aiming to develop the Golfinho and Atum fields with a production capacity of 12.88 million tonnes per year. Eni’s Coral South FLNG project in Mozambique has achieved a production capacity of 3.4 million tonnes per year. Additionally, the Greater Tortue Ahmeyim (GTA) LNG project, which started gas production in November 2022, is being developed by bp, Kosmos Energy and the national oil companies of Senegal and Mauritania. This project includes an FLNG facility with an initial capacity of 2.5 million tonnes per year.

Meanwhile Nigeria’s Train 7 project, an expansion of the existing NLNG facility on Bonny Island, aims to boost production by 8 million tonnes per year, bringing the total to about 30 million tonnes per year. This development is crucial for Nigeria’s growing population and its ability to meet its energy needs.

The AEC is calling out the financing disparity and says that it undermines Africa’s ability to harness its natural resources for its development and also perpetuates a cycle of energy deprivation.

Two new launch boats for the Port of Cape Town

The acquisition of the new vessels forms part of TNPA’s ongoing efforts to improve port efficiencies and is part of the marine fleet renewal programme. The two newly christened vessels will take up position in the Port of Cape Town.

After issuing the tender for the vessels in 2021, the contract to build the vessels got underway in November 2022 when the R58 million contract to construct and deliver the launch vessels was awarded to the Durban-based yard.

The tender documents called for a modern single-screw steel harbour launch with an overall length of 13m, a beam of 5 m and a draught of 1.6m.

In her delivery of a keynote address at the Christening Ceremony, TNPA Acting Port Manager for Cape Town, Ophelia Shabane said, “The arrival of these new crafts comes at an opportune time when TNPA is executing the Transnet Recovery Plan, through the acquisition of fit-for-purpose marine fleet to improve operational efficiencies. This also aligns with our commitment to meeting industry demands in the western region.”

The delivery of the new launch boats replaces the existing two launches that are over 40-years old and have reached operational and design lifespan.

“We welcome an opportunity to assist TNPA with the replenishment of its marine fleet under the TNPA Marine Fleet Renewal programme and Transnet Recovery Plan. SAS continues to play a pivotal role in the engineering and manufacturing of multiple purpose vessels for TNPA, many of which still provide a critical service to ports around the country” said Prasheen Maharaj Chief Executive Officer of Sandock Austral Shipyards.

The design of the launch boats is in accordance with the rules of Bureau Veritas Class notation and SAMSA requirements for this type of vessel.

SAS, a fully accredited ship building and ship repair facility holding various ISO accreditations undertook a large part of the manufacturing work with support from our specialist service providers.

The project has generated the creation of approximately 70 direct jobs and 40 indirect jobs through the SAS contractors. It has also supported the practical on-the-job training of 20 apprentices who gained an invaluable opportunity to apply newly acquired theoretical skills from the classroom training acquired within the SAS accredited in-house Apprentice Learning and Development Centre.

TRANSNET SECURES R5 BILLION LOAN TO IMPROVE AND MODERNISE

The New Development Bank (NDB) is pleased to announce a R5 billion loan agreement with Transnet, South Africa’s leading freight transport and logistics company. This investment, aligned with the theme of NDB’s 9th Annual Meeting, “Investing in a Sustainable Future,” will support the modernisation and improvement of South Africa’s freight rail sector.

The loan agreement, signed during NDB’s 9th Annual Meeting, aims to enhance the efficiency and capacity of South Africa’s freight rail systems. The improvement and modernization of freight rail sector program includes rail network infrastructure renewal, locomotive overhauls, and wagon fleet renewal. This program is expected to restore freight rail volumes in South Africa, improving operational performance and reliability, and contributing to a sustainable future.

NDB President, H.E. Dilma Rousseff, said, “We are delighted to partner with Transnet in this transformative initiative. This loan underscores NDB’s commitment to supporting sustainable development and economic growth in South Africa. By modernizing the freight rail sector, we aim to facilitate more efficient logistics operations that will benefit the entire region and align with our goal of investing in a sustainable future.”

Transnet Group Chief Executive, Michelle Phillips added, “This investment is important for Transnet, as we accelerate implementation of the Recovery Plan and economic reforms. The modernisation programme will enhance our operational capabilities and contribution to the growth and competitiveness of the economy. We are grateful for NDB’s support and look forward to a successful collaboration.”

About the NDB
The New Development Bank was created in 2015 by Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa to mobilize resources for infrastructure and sustainable development projects in the BRICS and other emerging market economies and developing countries. In 2021, the NDB began expanding its membership and admitted Bangladesh, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates and Uruguay as its new member countries. For more information, please visit www.ndb.int.